Watdapiep: Kim K. poses naked in tree

Kimmie gurl, we need to talk. I know you're not shy, and that a bare butt here and there doesn't really matter. But do you really hate clothes that much?

Does this really have to be on social media every time?

In the category we-haven't-seen-yet: Kim K. has while you were sleeping thrown a picture on the web in which she poses naked in a tree, wearing only a pair of hiking boots. Why tell me why, you might think. It has everything to do with the new book by photographers Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott that will be released soon. “So honored to be photographed by Mert and Marcus for their new book. This has been in the planning for twenty years,” Kim writes with the picture. Now the question remains: did she put stars on her nipple because of Instagram's policy or will she soon be fully all the way seen in the new book? Hmm, we'll have to wait and see.

What I do notice is Kim's Insta-behavior. After the robbery in Paris she took it easy on social, then there was a period with only blurry family pictures, but now she's going all the way again with selfies, parties, commercial deals, and bare butts. Not everyone agrees with her way of putting herself on the map. Sharon Osbourne (do we still remember that crazy lady?) sneered two days ago at the Kardashians in an interview with The Telegraph. “Kim does everything under the guise of feminism, but that's not feminism. Those girls live off their bodies. Half of L.A. has been through that and everything they do, from the sex tape to the sheer dresses and sportswear, everything is about sex, not about progress for women,” said the presenter. “If Kim wants to flaunt her body, that's fine. But that's not feminism, that's whorish. And there's nothing wrong with being whorish, but always remember what you are.” Aiii, keep that in your pocket, Kim. Oh then, eh, you first need to wear pants of course. And Sharon, don't be so jealous. You just want Kimmie's fame. And I can understand that.