Everything about Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's ‘leaked baby name’

Yep, we have now reached the point where not a day can go by without some royal drama-gossip-sensation things being thrown into the world. We wouldn't want it any other way. England is itching with impatience and we are happily breakdancing along.

And now. Again a ‘rumor has it’ that we need to talk about. There seems to be a ‘leak’ on the royal family's website. At least, if we are to believe a few very obsessive royal fans. They discovered earlier this week that the URL of the royal family suddenly does not give an error message when you add ’/prince-arthur‘, ’/prince-alexander,‘ or ’/prince-james’ to it, but redirects to the homepage. Meanwhile, you do get an error message with all other names. HA.

And so fans are sure: the baby is A: a boy and B: it will be one of these three names because otherwise that URL would never have been adjusted like that. Hmmm. I mainly wonder where a person finds the time to figure this out (do you spend an afternoon going through all conceivable names behind your computer or what?) and whether people just see what they want to see, but so be it, everyone has their fetish.

Despite the fact that the royal family almost never responds to rumors (a sentence that is now worth absolutely nothing, but okay) they have had to extinguish several fires since the Meghan era. Now again. ‘A large number of search term redirects were set up some time ago on royal.uk,’ said a spokesperson. ‘This was in order to improve user experience. For guidance you will note that other names preceded by “prince” or “princess” produce the same result.’

Anyway, you are all caught up. Are you dropping the big news this week, Meg? Seems like a great idea. We can be done with that gossip and nonsense. WE. WANT. THE. BABY.